|
|
||||||||
RESEARCH REPORT |
Department of Comparative Biomedical Sciences, Louisiana State University, School of Veterinary Medicine, Skip Bertman Drive, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA
* corresponding author, gwise{at}vetmed.lsu.edu
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
KEY WORDS: stem cells dental follicle differentiation
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
If the DF cells are differentiating into cell types other than the fibroblasts of the PDL, perhaps it is stem cells within the DF that are forming these other cell types. As is well-known, adult stem cells from a variety of sources have the capacity to differentiate into a limited number of cell types (i.e., they are pluripotent), whereas embryonic stem cells are totipotent and likely have the capacity to differentiate into any cell type that would originate from the endoderm, mesoderm, or ectoderm.
Stem cells appear to be present in the DF of human wisdom teeth (Morsczeck et al., 2005) and in the mouse DF (Luan et al., 2006). Regarding the latter, the authors cloned 3 DF cell lines, one of which likely was the fibroblastic DF cells that form the PDL, another that remained undifferentiated, and a third that exhibited mineralization behavior as revealed by von Kossa staining. Injection of bovine dental follicle cells into immunodeficient mice results in the formation of cementum, as detected by an anti-cementum attachment protein (Handa et al., 2002). More recently, a cementoblast progenitor cell line from bovine DF cells has been isolated and immortalized (Saito et al., 2005).
Given the above background, the objectives of this study were threefold: First, are stem cells present in the rat DF, as appears to be the case in humans, mice, and cows? Second, what are the differentiation capabilities of these stem cells? For example, can they differentiate only into cells derived from mesoderm, or can they differentiate into cell types that originate from other germ layers? Third, what are the properties of the stem cells such that they might be isolated in a cost-effective and efficient manner?
| MATERIALS & METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-MEM and 20% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS), referred to here as DF stem cells. For either culture, upon confluence, the cells were trypsinized and passaged into new flasks until the desired passages were obtained. The animal use protocol was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Louisiana State University.
Expression of the ABC Transport Gene
Total RNA was extracted from the DFs of the post-natal rat first mandibular molars (day 5 to day 11) and from the cultured DF cells and DF stem cells of passage 3 with a TRI REAGENT protocol (Molecular Research Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA). The RNA samples were digested with DNase I to remove any possible DNA. RNA concentration was measured by OD260 with the OD260/OD280 ratio greater than 1.9.
Gene expression of a side-population stem cell marker, BCRP, was determined by conventional RT-PCR. For this, the RNA was reverse-transcribed into cDNA with reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The PCR was conducted by the mixing of cDNA with gene-specific primers, dNTP, PCR buffer, and Taq DNA polymerase, followed by the running of 30 thermal cycles at (denaturing) 94°C for 45 sec, (annealing) 58°C for 1 min, and (extension) 72°C for 1 min. PCR was also conducted to amplify in parallel the β-actin gene that served as the control. The primer sequences for BCRP were as follows: 5' AGTCCGGAAAACAGCTGAGA 3' (forward), and 5'CCCATCACAACGTCATCTTG 3' (reverse). PCR products underwent electrophoresis in a 1% agarose gel and were visualized under UV light.
Cell Growth and Differentiation Experiments
To characterize the cell growth in culture, we seeded DF cells and DF stem cells at passage 3 and passage 9 in 3-cm-diameter tissue culture Petri dishes and cultured them with appropriate media (i.e., DF cells in MEM + 10% NCS + sodium pyruvate ; DF stem cells in
-MEM + 20% FBS).
To monitor for potential stem cells, we fixed cultures of either DF cells or DF stem cells in neutral-buffered formalin after culturing them for 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, and 15 days and then stained them for alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity by incubating them in ALP substrate solution containing 0.01% Naphthol AS-Mx phosphate for 15 min at room temperature. To determine if the cells could differentially pump out Hoechst, the substrate of BCRP, we added Hoechst 33342 to the culture medium at a final concentration of 0.2 µg/mL and then examined it under an inverted fluorescence microscope for blue nuclear staining after 20 min of incubation.
To determine the differentiation capabilities of the putative stem cells, we subjected DF stem cells to various differentiation procedures. For osteogenesis, cells were cultured for 2 wks in medium (Hung et al., 2002) consisting of DMEM-LG, 10% FBS, 50 µg/mL ascorbate-2 phosphate, 10–8 M dexamethasone , and 10 mM β-glycerophosphate (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), followed by von Kossa and Alizarin Red staining to assess for mineral deposition. In the absence of antibodies, which are specific for cementoblasts in the rat, and rat cDNA sequences for CAP or CEM-1, our method to detect osteoblasts may also be detecting cementoblasts. For adipogenesis, cells were cultured for 2 wks in medium (Hung et al., 2002) consisting of DMEM-LG, 10% FBS (Invitrogen Corporation, Carlsbad, CA, USA), 50 µg/mL ascorbate-2 phosphate (Sigma-Aldrich), 10–7 M dexamethasone (Sigma-Aldrich), and 50 µg/mL indomethacin (Sigma-Aldrich), with a medium change every 3 days. We then stained the cells with Oil Red O to evaluate adipogenesis.
To induce neurogenesis, we initially treated DF stem cells in a transition medium of DMEM-LG with 10% FBS and 10 ng/mL basic fibroblast growth factor for 24 hrs. Next, the cells were incubated in a neuronal induction medium of DMEM-LG, 2% DMSO, 200 µM butylated hydroxyanisole, 25 mM KCl, 2 mM valporic acid, 10 µM forskolin, 1 µM hydroxycortisone, 5 µg/mL insulin, and 2 mM L-glutamine. After 24 hrs of incubation, the cells were fixed and immunostained for neurofilament-200. Briefly, cells were fixed in cold methanol for 5 min, and incubated with anti-neurofilament-200 (Chemicon, Temecula, CA, USA) overnight at 4°C. Immunostaining controls were incubated with rabbit IgG instead of primary antibody. Next, they were incubated with secondary antibody labeled with horseradish peroxidase, followed by 3 washes with PBS. The horseradish peroxidase was detected by incubation with a DAB substrate.
In another experiment to determine if the DF stem cells were indeed the adipocyte precursors, we treated DF stem cells with doxorubicin (DOX), a substrate of BCRP, at concentrations of 0.5, 1, or 2 µM for 1, 2, 4, and 6 hrs. The surviving cells were placed in an adipogenesis differentiation medium, as previously described.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The above staining measures a calcification process and thus may be detecting cementum, as well as osteoid. Unfortunately, a specific antibody to detect cementum in the rat is not available. A 55-kDa cementum attachment protein (CAP) has been isolated from human and bovine teeth (McAllister et al., 1990; Narayanan et al., 1995). In turn, bovine DF cells, when transferred into immunodeficient mice, form cementum-like matrix that is positive for CAP by immunostaining (Handa et al., 2002). Recently, a cementoblast progenitor cell line has been developed from bovine DF cells, and these cells form cementum when transplanted into immunodeficient mice (Saito et al., 2005).
The above studies by others certainly indicate that at least some of the dental follicle cell population becomes cementoblasts. Although they do not specifically prove that these cementoblasts arise from the stem cells in the follicle, once a specific antibody to rat cementum is developed, experiments could be conducted to determine this. Given that BMP-2 may induce mouse dental follicle cells toward a cementoblast/osteoblast phenotype (Zhao et al., 2002), perhaps this would be a method to induce DF stem cells to form cementoblasts, which could then be detected by immunostaining. Furthermore, once rat cDNA sequences become available for CAP or CEM-1, a RT-PCR approach might be used for identification.
Of particular interest in this study is the fact that the DF stem cells can differentiate into adipocytes and neurons. Regarding the former, we believe that this is the first report that adipocytes can be formed from DF stem cells. Although this likely does not normally occur in vivo in the DF or subsequent PDL, it does demonstrate the ability of the stem cells to differentiate into several cell types.
The ability of the DF stem cells to differentiate into neurons may be, in effect, a reflection of the origin of the DF. The DF originates from the neural crest, and among the many derivatives of the neural crest are the dorsal root ganglia and ganglia of the autonomic nervous system. Thus, given the ancestry of the DF, it is likely that the stem cells in the DF also may arise from the neural crest and thus be easily induced to form neurons.
For future studies, particularly those involving tissue engineering, the DF stem cells will need to be isolated. The finding that DOX appears to eliminate the non-stem cells from the population may be a means of efficiently and inexpensively isolating side-population stem cells, provided that the cells maintain their pluripotent phenotype.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
Received January 15, 2008; Last revision May 6, 2008; Accepted May 14, 2008
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cahill DR, Marks SC Jr (1980). Tooth eruption: evidence for the central role of the dental follicle. J Oral Pathol 9:189–200.[ISI][Medline]
Diekwisch TGH (2001). The developmental biology of cementum. Int J Dev Biol 45:695–706.[ISI][Medline]
Handa K, Saito M, Yamauchi M, Kiyono T, Sato S, Teranaka T, et al. (2002). Cementum matrix formation in vivo by cultured dental follicle cells. Bone 31:606–611.[ISI][Medline]
Hung SC, Chen NJ, Hsieh SL, Li H, Ma HL, Lo WH (2002). Isolation and characterization of size-sieved stem cells from human bone marrow. Stem Cells 20:249–258.
Luan X, Ito Y, Dangaria S, Diekwisch TGH (2006). Dental follicle progenitor cell heterogeneity in the developing mouse periodontium. Stem Cells Dev 15:595–608.[ISI][Medline]
Marks SC Jr, Cahill DR (1984). Experimental study in the dog of the non-active role of the tooth in the eruptive process. Arch Oral Biol 29:311–322.[ISI][Medline]
McAllister B, Narayanan AS, Miki Y, Page RC (1990). Isolation of a fibroblast attachment protein from cementum. J Periodontal Res 25:99–105.[ISI][Medline]
Morsczeck C, Götz W, Schierholz J, Zeilhofer F, Kühn U, Möhl C, et al. (2005). Isolation of precursor cells (PCs) from human dental follicle of wisdom teeth. Matrix Biol 24:155–165.[ISI][Medline]
Narayanan AS, Ikezawa K, Wu D, Pitaru S (1995). Cementum specific components which influence periodontal connective tissue cells. Connect Tissue Res 33:19–21.[Medline]
Saito M, Handa K, Kiyono T, Hattori S, Yokoi T, Tsubakimoto T, et al. (2005). Immortalization of cementoblast progenitor cells with Bmi-1 and TERT. J Bone Miner Res 20:50–57.[ISI][Medline]
Wise GE, Yao S (2006). Regional differences of expression of bone morphogenetic protein-2 and RANKL in the rat dental follicle. Eur J Oral Sci 114:512–516.[ISI][Medline]
Wise GE, Lin F, Fan W. (1992). Culture and characterization of dental follicle cells from rat molars. Cell Tissue Res 267:483–492.[ISI][Medline]
Wise GE, Frazier-Bowers S, DSouza RN (2002). Cellular, molecular, and genetic determinants of tooth eruption. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 13:323–334.
Wise GE, Yao S, Odgren PR, Pan F (2005). CSF-1 regulation of osteoclastogenesis for tooth eruption. J Dent Res 84:837–841.
Zeichner-David M, Oishi K, Su Z, Zakartchenko V, Chen L-S, Arzate H, et al. (2003). Role of Hertwigs epithelial root sheath cells in tooth root development. Dev Dyn 228:651–663.[ISI][Medline]
Zhao M, Xiao G, Berry JE, Franceschi RT, Reddi A, Somerman MJ (2002). Bone morphogenetic protein 2 induces dental follicle cells to differentiate toward a cementoblast/osteoblast phenotype. J Bone Miner Res 17:1441–1451.[ISI][Medline]
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| IADR Journals | Advances in Dental Research ® |
| Journal of Dental Research ® | Critical Reviews (1990-2004) |