JDR JDR Most Cited Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bradbury, J.
Right arrow Articles by Moynihan, P.J.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bradbury, J.
Right arrow Articles by Moynihan, P.J.
J Dent Res 87(8):720-725, 2008
© 2008 International and American Associations for Dental Research


RESEARCH REPORT
Clinical

Perceived Chewing Ability and Intake of Fruit and Vegetables

J. Bradbury1,*, J.M. Thomason2, N.J.A. Jepson2, A.W.G. Walls2, C.E. Mulvaney3, P.F. Allen4, and P.J. Moynihan2

2 School of Dental Sciences, Newcastle University, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4BW, UK

* corresponding author, jane.bradbury{at}sheffield.ac.uk

Edentulous individuals have reduced chewing ability and lower fruit and vegetable consumption compared with dentate individuals. It has been suggested that the two are causally related. However, psychosocial factors such as attitude, self-identity, and knowledge of recommendations are predictive of intake in non-edentulous persons. The aims of this study were to: determine if perceived chewing ability was predictive of fruit and vegetable intake; explore the predictive ability of knowledge, attitude, and self-identity; and compare intake between edentulous and dentate individuals. Full denture-wearing (N = 79) and dentate persons (N = 52) completed a three-day food diary. Perceived chewing ability, sociodemographic, and psychosocial factors were assessed via self-administered questionnaire. The dentate persons consumed significantly more fruit and vegetables, but differences were not significant when juices were excluded. Perceived chewing ability explained ~ 4% variance in intake. Attitude, self-identity, and knowledge explained a further ~ 20%. If the diet of denture-wearers is to be improved, psychosocial factors, as well as perceived chewing ability, must be addressed.

KEY WORDS: fruit and vegetables • perceived chewing ability • self-identity • nutrition knowledge • attitude







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 2008 Institutional Access Guidelines